Link Search Menu Expand Document

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does explain() show that the GPU will be used even after setting spark.rapids.sql.enabled to false?

Apache Spark caches what is used to build the output of the explain() function. That cache has no knowledge about configs, so it may return results that are not up to date with the current config settings. This is true of all configs in Spark. If you changed spark.sql.autoBroadcastJoinThreshold after running explain() on a DataFrame, the resulting query would not change to reflect that config and still show a SortMergeJoin even though the new config might have changed to be a BroadcastHashJoin instead. When actually running something like with collect, show or write a new DataFrame is constructed causing spark to re-plan the query. This is why spark.rapids.sql.enabled is still respected when running, even if explain shows stale results.

What versions of Apache Spark does the RAPIDS Accelerator for Apache Spark support?

The RAPIDS Accelerator for Apache Spark requires version 3.0.0 or 3.0.1 of Apache Spark. Because the plugin replaces parts of the physical plan that Apache Spark considers to be internal the code for those plans can change even between bug fix releases. As a part of our process, we try to stay on top of these changes and release updates as quickly as possible.

Which distributions are supported?

The RAPIDS Accelerator for Apache Spark officially supports Apache Spark, AWS EMR 6.2.0, Databricks Runtime 7.3 and Google Cloud Dataproc. Most distributions based off of Apache Spark 3.0.0 should work, but because the plugin replaces parts of the physical plan that Apache Spark considers to be internal the code for those plans can change from one distribution to another. We are working with most cloud service providers to set up testing and validation on their distributions.

What is the right hardware setup to run GPU accelerated Spark?

Reference architectures should be available around Q1 2021.

What CUDA versions are supported?

CUDA 10.1, 10.2 and 11.0 are currently supported, but you need to download the cudf jar that corresponds to the version you are using. Please look [here][download.md] for download links for the latest release.

What parts of Apache Spark are accelerated?

Currently a limited set of SQL and DataFrame operations are supported, please see the configs for a more complete list of what is supported. Some of structured streaming is likely to be accelerated, but it has not been an area of focus right now. Other areas like MLLib, GraphX or RDDs are not accelerated.

What is the road-map like?

Please look at the github repository https://github.com/nvidia/spark-rapids It contains issue tracking and planning for sprints and releases.

How much faster will my query run?

Any single operator isn’t a fixed amount faster. So there is no simple algorithm to see how much faster a query will run. In addition, Apache Spark can store intermediate data to disk and send it across the network, both of which we typically see as bottlenecks in real world queries. Generally for complicated queries where all the processing can run on the GPU we see between 3x and 7x speedup, with a 4x speedup typical. We have seen as high as 100x in some specific cases.

What operators are best suited for the GPU?

  • Group by operations with high cardinality
  • Joins with a high cardinality
  • Sorts with a high cardinality
  • Window operations, especially for large windows
  • Complicated processing
  • Writing Parquet/ORC
  • Reading CSV
  • Transcoding (reading an input file and doing minimal processing before writing it out again, possibly in a different format, like CSV to Parquet)

Are there initialization costs?

From our tests the GPU typically takes about 2 to 3 seconds to initialize when an executor first starts. If you are only going to run a single query that only takes a few seconds to run this can be problematic. In general if you are going to do 30 seconds or more of processing within a single session the overhead can be amortized.

Why is the size of my output Parquet/ORC file different?

This can come down to a number of factors. The GPU version often compresses data in smaller chunks to get more parallelism and performance. This can result in larger files in some instances. We have also seen instances where the ordering of the data can have a big impact on the output size of the files. Spark tends to prefer sort based joins, and in some cases sort based aggregations, whereas the GPU versions are all hash based. This means that the resulting data can come out in a different order for the CPU and the GPU. This is not wrong, but can make the size of the output data different because of compression. Users can turn on (spark.rapids.sql.hashOptimizeSort.enabled)[configs.md#sql.hashOptimizeSort.enabled] to have the GPU try to replicate more closely what the output ordering would have been if sort were used, like on the CPU.

How are failures handled?

The RAPIDS accelerator does not change the way failures are normally handled by Apache Spark.

How does the Spark scheduler decide what to do on the GPU vs the CPU?

Technically the Spark scheduler does not make those decisions. The plugin has a set of rules that decide if an operation can safely be replaced by a GPU enabled version. We are working on some cost based optimizations to try and improve performance for some situations where it might be more efficient to stay on the CPU instead of going back and forth.

Is Dynamic Partition Pruning (DPP) Supported?

Yes, DPP still works. It might not be as efficient as it could be, and we are working to improve it.

Is Adaptive Query Execution (AQE) Supported?

In the 0.2 release, AQE is supported but all exchanges will default to the CPU. As of the 0.3 release, running on Spark 3.0.1 and higher any operation that is supported on GPU will now stay on the GPU when AQE is enabled.

Are cache and persist supported?

Yes cache and persist are supported, but they are not GPU accelerated yet. We are working with the Spark community on changes that would allow us to accelerate compression when caching data.

Can I cache data into GPU memory?

No, that is not currently supported. It would require much larger changes to Apache Spark to be able to support this.

Is PySpark supported?

Yes

Are the R APIs for Spark supported?

Yes, but we don’t actively test them.

Are the Java APIs for Spark supported?

Yes, but we don’t actively test them.

Are the Scala APIs for Spark supported?

Yes

Is the GPU needed on the driver? Are there any benefits to having a GPU on the driver?

The GPU is not needed on the driver and there is no benefit to having one available on the driver for the RAPIDS plugin.

How does the performance compare to DataBricks’ DeltaEngine?

We have not evaluated the performance yet. DeltaEngine is not open source, so any analysis needs to be done with Databricks in some form. When DeltaEngine is generally available and the terms of service allow it, we will look into doing a comparison.

How many tasks can I run per executor? How many should I run per executor?

There is no limit on the number of tasks per executor that you can run. Generally we recommend 2 to 6 tasks per executor and 1 GPU per executor. The GPU typically benefits from having 2 tasks run in parallel on it at a time, assuming your GPU has enough memory to support that. Having 2 to 3 times as many tasks off of the GPU as on the GPU allows for I/O to be run in parallel with the processing. If you increase the tasks too high you can overload the I/O and starting the initial processing can suffer. But if you have a lot of processing that cannot be done on the GPU, like complex UDFs, the more tasks you have the more CPU processing you can throw at it.

How can I run custom expressions/UDFs on the GPU?

We do not currently support this, but we are working on ways to make it possible.

Why am I getting an error when trying to use pinned memory?

Caused by: ai.rapids.cudf.CudaException: OS call failed or operation not supported on this OS
	at ai.rapids.cudf.Cuda.hostAllocPinned(Native Method)
	at ai.rapids.cudf.PinnedMemoryPool.<init>(PinnedMemoryPool.java:254)
	at ai.rapids.cudf.PinnedMemoryPool.lambda$initialize$1(PinnedMemoryPool.java:185)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)

This is typically caused by the IOMMU being enabled. Please see the CUDA docs for this issue.

To fix it you can either disable the IOMMU, or you can disable using pinned memory by setting spark.rapids.memory.pinnedPool.size to 0.

Is speculative execution supported?

Yes, speculative execution in Spark is fine with the RAPIDS accelerator plugin.

As with all speculative execution, it may or may not be beneficial depending on the nature of why a particular task is slow and how easily speculation is triggered. You should monitor your Spark jobs to see how often task speculation occurs and how often the speculating task (i.e.: the one launched later) finishes before the slow task that triggered speculation. If the speculating task often finishes first then that’s good, it is working as intended. If many tasks are speculating, but the original task always finishes first then this is a pure loss, the speculation is adding load to the Spark cluster with no benefit.